How do you find “good” tools in the age of misinformation and information overload?
- Search results
- Clinical knowledge (professional associations like RSFQ, NCIM, CAM)
- Academic expertise
- Experience, ancestral knowledge
All these sources are valid and have their place in the compilation and transmission of information. Here is an image to better visualize the evidence hierarchy, the top of the pyramid representing stronger evidence.
Before starting our search for information, it is important to:
- What are we looking for (have a clear question in mind)?
- Determine keywords for the search.
- Identify quality research sites.
- Have the tools to evaluate the articles or data found.
Not all published research is “good research”. It is important to opt for research sites that are constantly updated and that allow access to the full article (open source/open access).
Examples of preferred research sites in the midwifery context:
Health evidence de McMaster,a canadian university that allows research in French and English
Cochrane Library
For clinical tools:
ACCESS
The article will generally follow the following structure:
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
Assessment tracks:
- Who is funding it?
- Who is the author(s) (do they have the required expertise in the field)? Have the authors’ conflicts of interest been declared? The first author is often the one who will have played the biggest role in the study, so it can be interesting to see what other work he/she has produced.
- Has the article been peer reviewed?
- When was it published, is it up to date?
- Is the structure consistent? Is the methodology clear?
- What was carried out? (type of research, characteristics of the participants, recruitment, research and instruments used)
- What are the most significant results, what is the statistical value of the results?
- If percentages are given, what is the sample size? What is the confidence interval?
- Is the population comparable to the one for which I am looking for information?
- Are references numerous and diversified?
When developing clinical guidelines: consider the GRADE tool
An international team of researchers have created a method to improve systems for evaluating evidence and scoring recommendations when developing clinical guidelines. They developed the GRADE tool.
GRADE: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.
The GRADE method aims to classify evidence according to levels of high, moderate, low or very low quality. This systematic approach differs in that the quality of the evidence is assessed for each outcome of each study and not just according to the type of study (e.g. a randomized study will not be automatically superior).
It encourages transparency and the consideration of important results, allowing a better distribution of the advantages and disadvantages, and a better understanding of how and why the recommendations were formulated despite the fact that consensus cannot be reached.
More concretely, the tool makes it possible to qualify the recommendations in a clinical guide (e.g. weak or strong recommendation, quality of evidence high, medium, low or very low).
For more informations:
l’Association ontarienne des sages-femmes
l’Université Laval
The Canadian Association of Midwives’ Immunization Glossary can be a helpful tool.
Definition of key epidemiology concepts in clinical research in this glossary.
To go further in the understanding of concepts in statistics such as the confidence interval, measurement of tendency of dispersion, measurement of central tendency. Check out these quick videos on the Statistics Canada site.
Associations website
Regroupement Les sages-femmes du Québec
Association canadienne des sages-femmes
Association of Ontario midwives
Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada
National council of Indigenous midwives
Mobile app (développed by the Association of Ontario midwives)
For Iphone and Android
COVID-19 resources for midwives
RM Rx for Midwives (Certaines informations sur les vaccins ici)
Government Resources
Protocole d’immunisation du Québec (PIQ)
Institut national de santé publique du Québec
Agence de la santé publique du Canada
Comité consultatif national de l’immunisation (CCNI)
References
Association of Ontario midwives, GRADE Methodology, https://www.ontariomidwives.ca/grade-methodology
Récupéré le 9 mars 2023
Localisation et application d’informations fondées sur des données probantes, Association canadienne des sages-femmes. 9 mars 2023
Statistique Canada. Statistiques 101 : intervalle de confiance. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/fr/afc/litteratie-donnees/catalogue/892000062022003
Récupéré le 14 mars 2023